That's right, a university (funded largely through tuition) is offering to pay an expense a corporate tycoon refuses to pay. I'd say there's not only some entitlement in the air, but a whiff of desperation as well.
This isn't the first time the Nationals have refused to pay to keep metro open late. It happened a couple of years ago when the team made the playoffs. The company Living Social ended up picking up the tab.
To be fair, picking up the tab for extended metro hours during a major league sporting event usually isn't that costly. In fact, all of the other major sports franchises in the city have agreements to pay the upfront costs. Why? Because metro agrees to refund the fee if ridership covers the expense, and it usually does.
So, given all that, why in the hell can't the Lerner family--the entitled tycoons at the center of today's truth is stranger than fiction drama--manage to cough up the cash? It appears the Lerners, who didn't even pay for most of the stadium their team plays in, think the city should cover it. Why? Well, here's what the Nationals PR
Another interpretation is that what we have here is a classic case of a corporate welfare queen grown so fat and lazy that it's now looking for private largess to add to its government goodie bag.*
FYI, you know you're in trouble when even the owner of Washington's football team agrees to cover expenses for his late night games.
What about AU's role? Full disclosure--I teach at AU. My initial reaction, when my husband read the headline to me this morning, was disbelief. Why would AU--a university at the other end of town from the stadium--pay for that? It's not like AU is a well known location for 'natitude.' Sure, some of the students, staff, and profs like the team, but it isn't visibly noticeable in any way. In fact, a lot of students are from other cities, and continue to root for their home teams when they come here.
Turns out, AU is a "higher education partner" with the Nationals. According to the Washington Post article linked to above, the partnerhsip gives the university "high visibility inside the ballpark through signs, T-shirt giveaways and other promotional activities." I wonder if my smiling face graces any of them? Sigh, a girl can dream.
You could call this an innovative way to market a university. Or, you could call it an own goal (sorry to mix my sport metaphors dear reader, but I simply could not resist). None of the comments at the end of the article applauded AU for the move. Most comments focused solely on the Nats (and none of them were good). When AU did get a mention, the tone was blase at best (this is what all universities do) and scathing at worst. At least two commentators saw a branding effort in backfire mode, as in AU just demoted itself to the amateur league where the community colleges** and for-profit universities play the advert game.
We seem to have an advertising fail. So, why don't we create a scholarship win instead? Take the money and establish a scholarship for a local kid in the DMV who can't afford AU's tuition but wants to come here. That's a positive way to build a brand in the city and region.
* It is also possible that MLB is playing hardball, pushing the Lerner family to refuse to pay the fees so other teams in other cities won't have to agree to similar deals. Even if this is the case, it doesn't make the Lerner's entitlement any better. It just makes MLB look bad as well.
** I wish community colleges did more advertising. They are cheaper than for-profits and they have much higher graduation rates. Check 'em out!
No comments:
Post a Comment